If you go to trial after rejecting the defendant’s offer to go to voluntary binding arbitration in your medical malpractice case, your compensation awarded at trial will be limited to economic damages (medical bills, lose wages/time missed at work, etc.) and noneconomic damages in the form of pain and suffering (described above) up to $350,000.
In regards to the economic damages mentioned above, you will be entitled to recover past and expected future medical bills, as well as up to 80 percent of your wage loss and loss of future earning capacity. Loss of future earning capacity refers to the amount of money you will lose in the future as a result of your not being able to work or not being able to work as much.
In order to determine your loss of future earning capacity, your attorney may hire an expert called a vocational rehabilitation expert. The vocational expert will evaluate you and attempt to determine what work, if any, you’ll be able to do in the future. Your attorney may also hire an expert called an economist, who will attempt to quantify and give a number for the amount of money you are expected to lose in the future as a result of your inability to work or work as much.
In order to attempt to determine what your future medical bills will be, your attorney may hire an expert called a life-care planner. The life care planner will evaluate you and attempt to determine how much your future medical treatment will cost.
After the arbitration of your medical malpractice or negligence case, the defendant will have 20 days to pay the award.
Yes, after an arbitration award in a medical malpractice case, either party (you or the defendant) can appeal the award. The appeal will be with the district court of appeal (DCA) for the district where the arbitration happened (for example, if your arbitration occurred in Broward County, the appeal would be to Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal/4th DCA).
Yes, in your medical malpractice case, you will have to go to a mandatory mediation within 120 days of the filing of your lawsuit – unless the parties to your case agree to extend this time period. This settlement conference must occur prior to three weeks before the trial date of your case.
At the mediation, you, your attorney, the defendant, the defense attorney and the defendant’s insurance company will all meet with a mediator. A mediator is a neutral, independent party who will attempt to help the parties to compromise and settle their case. At the mediation, typically both your attorney and the attorney for the defendant will present their case. This will happen in a common room in which all parties are present.
Once the presentations have been made, both sides will be split up into separate rooms (called “caucuses”). You and your attorney will go into one room; and the defendant, the defense attorney and possibly a representative from the defendant’s insurance company (called an “adjuster”) will go into another room. You will typically make a demand to settle, and the defense will make an offer. Numbers will be passed back and forth (you may agree to reduce your demand as the defense increases their offer). At some point, both sides will either agree on a number (in which case a settlement of the case will result) or not (in which case you will leave the mediation, an “impasse” of the mediation will result, and your case will continue).
Yes, during the presuit screening period, the medical malpractice statute of limitations is tolled/extended. That is, the statute of limitations will not run during the presuit screening period.
Further, during the 90-day investigation period, the parties may agree to extend the statute of limitations. If negotiations end, then you will have 60 days (or the remainder of the statute of limitations period, if that is longer) to file your lawsuit.
This rule is based on Florida Statute 766.106.
The hospital where your medical malpractice or negligence occurred may carry liability insurance of at least 1.5 million per claim. The hospital may require that its physicians, osteopathic physicians, podiatric physicians, dentists, and nurses pay part of the costs of this insurance. This is because, if one of those medical providers commits medical malpractice while working at the hospital, he or she may be covered by the insurance. If the doctor is covered by the insurance, then the hospital may require that he or she pay a deductible when medical malpractice occurs.
Yes, if you were injured due to medical malpractice or negligence at a hospital, you may be able to pursue a case against the hospital. Hospitals are required to ensure that their staff are competent. Hospitals must properly vet potential staff members and must also properly supervise the activities of those staff members. Further, hospitals must implement an effective risk management program. If they don’t and such a failure leads to medical malpractice, hospitals can be responsible.
Yes, if you are injured due to medical malpractice which occurred at a public hospital, then you may be able to pursue a case against the public hospital – although this would be a case of sovereign immunity since it would be against an entity owned and run by the government. Some hospitals are government run and own, and some are privately owned. If your case is against a public hospital, then there may be restrictions and caps on how much compensation you can recover. It is best to contact an attorney in order to determine if the hospital where you were injured was publicly or privately owned, and how this will affect your case.
Yes, if you’ve been injured due to medical malpractice, you can make a complaint regarding the hospital or doctor who caused your injury to the Division of Medical Quality Assurance. You can do this regardless of whether there was a settlement in your case. However, the fact that there was a settlement can’t be used against the doctor or hospital in your case (i.e., you can’t argue that the fact that the doctor or hospital settled is evidence that he, she or it was at fault and knew it). This is pursuant to Florida Statute 766.112.
Noneconomic damages are damages other than medical bills, lost wages/time missed or lost from work, etc. They refer specifically to pain and suffering, etc. In the State of Florida, there is a cap of $500,000 on the amount of noneconomic damages that can be recovered in a medical malpractice case. This means that $500,000 is the most that you can recover for your pain & suffering after being injured due to medical malpractice in the State of Florida.
There are, however, exceptions to this rule. They include:
If any of the above three exceptions apply, then you will be able to recover up to $1 million in compensation for your injuries – rather than the typical $500,000.
The computation of non-economic damages is regulated by Florida Statute 766.118.
Yes, in a medical malpractice case against an emergency room or emergency room physician, the most you can typically recover in noneconomic damages is $150,000.
Yes, if the hospital or doctor whose medical malpractice caused your injury treated you as a Medicaid recipient, then the most you will be able to recover in noneconomic damages is $200,000. The only exception to this is if you are able to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the hospital or doctor acted in a “wrongful manner.” A hospital or doctor will be said to have acted in a wrongful manner if he or she acted in bad faith, with malicious purpose or in a manner exhibiting wanton and willful disregard of human rights, safety or property.
Wanton and Willful actions are worse than simple negligence. A careless mistake by a doctor or hospital can qualify as negligence. Wanton and willful behavior requires more – typically some element of intent or gross negligence on the part of the hospital or doctor. For example, if the doctor intended on doing wrong or knew that what he or she was doing was wrong, then the doctor’s behavior will be deemed wanton and willful and you will be able to recover more than $200,000 in non-economic damages – even though you were a Medicaid recipient.
If the insurance company for the hospital or doctor whose medical malpractice caused your injuries acts in bad faith, then you will be able to recover more than the policy limits of the insurance policy. The policy limits are typically the maximum amount recoverable under an insurance policy. A doctor or hospital pays premiums in order to obtain an insurance policy; the higher the premiums, the bigger will be the policy. If you are injured due to the medical malpractice or negligence of that doctor or hospital, typically the most you will be able to recover is the policy limits.
An insurance company has a responsibility to pay out its policy limits if your case so warrants. For example, if you are catastrophically injured due to the obvious medical malpractice or negligence of a doctor or hospital insured by an insurance company, then the insurance company has an obligation to pay out its policy limits. If the insurance company doesn’t do so, then it will be deemed to be in “bad faith.” An insurance company deemed to be in bad faith can be responsible for more than just its policy limits (even though it would have only been responsible for paying its policy limits if it had done so within a reasonable amount of time after your injuries).
Bad faith actions in the medical malpractice context are regulated by Florida Statute 766.1185.
Yes, if the defendant in your medical malpractice or negligence case denied your claim, the defendant must provide a written report from a medical expert or doctor asserting that there are reasonable grounds for the denial of your claim (i.e., that there wasn’t medical malpractice or negligence). This is pursuant to Florida Statute 766.203.
Yes, if either party to a medical malpractice case requests medical records in the possession of the other party (e.g., the defendant), then that other party must provide copies of those medical records. This is pursuant to Florida Statute 766.204.
Yes, during the pre-suit portion of a medical malpractice case, both parties (i.e., the plaintiff and defendant) have an obligation to participate in “informal” discovery. Discovery is the process wherein each side learns what evidence the other side has or what the position of the other side is. Formal discovery typically takes place after a lawsuit is filed and is usually in the form of “interrogatories” (written questions that must be answered by the opposing party), “requests for production/to produce” (requests for documents or items in the possession of the opposing party), “requests for admissions” (requests that certain statements are admitted), depositions, and medical examinations.
In a medical malpractice case, on the other hand, informal discovery typically takes place before a lawsuit is filed. Informal discovery doesn’t require such formalities as requests for production/to produce, for example. Rather than sending a request for production as one would do in formal discovery, you could simply ask the defendant in your case to produce the documents relevant to your case in his or her possession. In the informal discovery phase of a medical malpractice case, the defendant is required to give those documents to you.
The informal discovery phase of a medical malpractice case is governed by Florida Statute 766.205.
Yes, if either party doesn’t follow the presuit requirements of your medical malpractice case (for example, by not attaching a written expert opinion by a doctor or medical expert), then the Judge may dismiss that party’s claim or defense. If you don’t follow the pre-suit requirements of a medical malpractice case, then your claim can be dismissed by the Judge. If the defendant doesn’t follow the pre-suit requirements of a medical malpractice claim, then the Judge may strike the defendant’s pleading (i.e., strike its defense).
In such a scenario, the losing party shall be responsible for paying the other side’s attorney’s fees and costs. If you claim gets dismissed, you will be responsible for paying the defendant’s attorney’s fees and costs. On the other hand, if the defendant’s pleading gets dismissed, then the defendant will be responsible for paying for your attorney’s fees and costs. This is pursuant to Florida Statute 766.206.
Yes, if your child sustains a birth-related neurological injury due to the medical malpractice or negligence of any doctor or hospital during the labor, birth, delivery or immediate post-delivery resuscitation, you must apply for compensation through the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (as opposed to simply filing a lawsuit).
The exception to this is if you can show clear and convincing evidence of bad faith, malicious purpose or willful and wanton disregard of human rights, safety or property. Bad faith or malicious purpose indicates an intent on the part of the doctor or hospital employees to cause harm or at least a consciousness that his or her actions may cause harm. Willful and wonton disregard indicates more than simple negligence. Negligence could indicate only a mistake on the part of the doctor or hospital. Willful and wonton disregard indicates more, such as a recklessness that has a high probability of causing injuries to others. This is pursuant to Florida Statute 766.303.
If you apply for compensation through the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, an administrative law judge will decide your case. This is based on Florida Statute 766.304.
Yes, if the administrative law judge rules against you, you can then (but only then) file a lawsuit and pursue a case in civil Court.
In order to start a case with the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, you must file a petition with the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association. In the petition, you must include the following information:
You must also provide the Association with enough copies to serve the doctor and hospital, as well as a $15 filing fee.
Within 10 days of filing the initial petition, you must also provide:
The proper procedures for filing a Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation petition are given in Florida Statute 766.305.
After the filing of your petition, the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association has 45 days to respond to the petition. After 60 days from the filing of your petition and before 120 days, the administrative law Judge must set a hearing in your case.
Yes, before the hearing of your Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan petition, you can engage in discovery. This means that you can send interrogatories (i.e., written questions) to witnesses and take depositions (wherein you will be able to ask questions of the witnesses) as well.
The hearing of your Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association Plan will take place in the County where the birth injury occurred. Both you and the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association will be present.
At the hearing, the administrative law judge will make the following decisions:
The administrative law judge may also bifurcate the hearing on compensability and the award. This means that the administrative law judge may decide in one hearing if you are entitled to compensation, and in another hearing how much compensation you receive.
The procedures/process of a Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan hearing are given in Florida Statute 766.307.
If you win your Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan hearing, you will be entitled to compensation for the following items of damages:
Yes, if you lose your Florida Birth-Related Injury Compensation Plan hearing or you are unhappy with the award, you can appeal the decision to the District Court of Appeal (DCA) of the jurisdiction where your hearing was held. For example, if your hearing was held in Broward County, then you can appeal the decision to Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeals (4th DCA).
After a birth-related neurological injury, you have five years to file a petition with the Florida Birth Related Neurological Injury Association. After that, you can no longer file the petition.
If your doctor, hospital, medical provider or health-care provider failed to diagnose your medical condition and your condition became worse as a result, you may have a medical malpractice case based on failure to diagnose. What you will need to prove is that your condition became worse because of the failure to diagnose or delayed diagnosis. That is, you will need to prove that, but for the failure to diagnose or delayed diagnosis, your condition would not have worsened.
The defense in these cases will typically argue that your condition would have worsened either way (i.e., even if the diagnosis was made earlier). That is, the defendant may argue that the condition was bad enough initially that it would have progressed inevitably.
In order to counter this defense, you will need to prove that, had you been diagnosed earlier, the worsening of the condition could have been sto pped and the progression avoided. In order to do this, your attorney will most likely hire a doctor or medical expert to evaluate you and your condition and testify that the failure to diagnose or delayed diagnosis caused the worsening of your condition.
Anthony Quackenbush handles medical practice cases in Fort Lauderdale and throughout the State of Florida. If you’ve been injured due to a medical malpractice or negligence case occurring anywhere in Florida, contact Mr. Quackenbush at 954-448-7288. He will give you a free, no obligation consultation. He will gladly talk to you about your case for free.
If Mr. Quackenbush ends up as the attorney on your case, he will work on contingency. This means that there is no charge to you up front. In fact, you will not be charged by Mr. Quackenbush until you’ve received compensation in your case – so there is absolutely no risk to you whatsoever.